Cryoglobulinemic Vasculitis in Disguise: Cryofibrinogenemia as Variant of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance.

Monoclonal gammopathy with cryoactivity (ie, cryoglobulins) that causes glomerulonephritis is considered within the spectrum of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance. Cryofibrinogenemia (cryoactivity of coagulation factors) is very rarely associated with glomerulonephritis. We present a 39-year-old woman with a relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Laboratory investigation detected cryofibrinogen; the precipitate consisted of fibrinogen and a monoclonal immunoglobulin (M-protein; IgG-λ), and the latter was also detected in serum (4g/L). Initial conventional immunosuppressive therapy resulted in temporary renal remission. In view of the M-protein, subsequent therapy consisted of bortezomib/dexamethasone and high-dose melphalan followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and resulted in a very good partial hematological response and temporary renal remission. However, after hematological and renal relapse, we performed unique experiments to clarify the role of the M-protein. Mixing patient serum with donor plasma resulted in cryoactivity, composed of M-protein+fibrinogen. Patient plasma deprived of M-protein did not have cryoactivity. Therefore, cryoactivity was dependent on the M-protein. We started lenalidomide, which resulted in very good partial hematological and renal remission. Thus, cryofibrinogenemia can be the consequence of an M-protein, which we suggest should be defined as monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance.

Comparison of different immunoassays for the detection of antibodies against Intrinsic Factor and Parietal Cells.

OBJECTIVES: In the diagnostic work up of autoimmune gastritis several immunological methods are available for the detection of antibodies against Intrinsic Factor (IF) and Parietal Cells (PC). However, there are no recent reports directly comparing all the available assays and methods. The objective of this study was to compare the performance of several commercially available anti-IF and anti-PC antibody assays from different manufacturers in a multi-center multi-cohort setting. METHODS: Sera were used from 5 different cohorts consisting of samples from 25 healthy elderly, 20 HCV or HIV positive patients and 150 patients positive for anti-IF or anti-PC antibodies or in whom these antibodies were requested. These cohorts were tested for anti-IF antibodies with 6 different assays (IIF, ELISA, DIA and EliA) and for anti-PC antibodies with 7 different assays (IIF, ELISA, DIA and EliA). Performance was evaluated by calculating the concordance and relative sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Good concordance was found between the assays for both antibody specificities, ranging from 81 to 100% and 91-100% for anti-IF and anti-PC antibodies, respectively. Highest relative sensitivity was found with the (automated) ELISA based methods. However, all assays had a relative sensitivity between 85 and 100% for anti-IF antibodies and between 95 and 100% for anti-PC antibodies. The relative specificity ranged between 76 and 100% for anti-IF antibodies and between 96 and 100% for anti-PC antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that most assays perform well and are concordant to each other, despite the methodological differences and the different sources of antigen used. However, the method used affects the sensitivity and specificity. The (automated) ELISA based assays have the highest relative sensitivity and relative specificity. Care should be taken in the interpretation of positive results by IIF and negative results by the Blue Diver when testing for anti-IF antibodies.

Identification of a novel non-coding mutation in C1qB in a Dutch child with C1q deficiency associated with recurrent infections.

INTRODUCTION: C1q deficiency is a rare genetic disorder that is strongly associated with development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Several mutations in the coding regions of the C1q genes have been described that result in stop-codons or other genetic abnormalities ultimately leading to C1q deficiency. Here we report on a Dutch boy suffering from recurrent infections with a complete C1q deficiency, without any SLE symptoms. METHODS: The presence of C1q in serum was assessed using ELISA and hemolytic assay. By western blot we examined the different C1q chains in cell lysates. We identified the mutation using deep-sequencing. By qPCR we studied the mRNA expression of C1qA, C1qB and C1qC in the PBMCs of the patient. RESULTS: Deep-sequencing revealed a homozygous mutation in the non-coding region of C1qB in the patient, whereas both parents were heterozygous. The mutation is located two nucleotides before the splice site of the second exon. In-silico analyses predict a complete abrogation of this natural splice site. Analyses of in vitro cultured cells from the patient revealed a lack of production of C1q and intracellular absence of C1qB in the presence of C1qA and C1qC peptides. Quantitative PCR analysis revealed total absence of C1qB mRNA, a reduced level of C1qA mRNA and normal levels of C1qC mRNA. CONCLUSION: In this study we report a new mutation in the non-coding region of C1qB that is associated with C1q deficiency.